Beginner's first-hand review on Design Spark Mechanical
Follow article
Firstly, I must say that I am a beginner with mechanical drawing and 3D CAD design. Previously I have tried out software such as AutoCAD and Solidworks. One of the major advantage I found with DesignSpark Mechanical, is that it’s licence is free to use with no comercial restrictions. Other software I have used is only free for a limited duration.
My biggest challenge is when I need to create some quick drawings of models or prototypes. With DesignSpark Mechanical, that’s not an issue, It's quite straightforward to use, and I can quickly and easily create designs and export my designs out to a 3D printer.
Another great feature of this software is the 3D model library, which I could open and import the models I needed for my design. For example, I can design a case for my Arduino Uno board just by importing the model into my drawing
The download and insert into drawing button makes things easy even for a beginner like me.
The next feature that really amazed me was the “PULL” function, which allows you to create a 3D drawing out of a surface.
The pull tool can also be used to create holes which I used to create holes for the USB and power jack port.
I found DesignSpark Mechanical very easy to pick up and for every tool, there’s a brief explanation when we hover the pointer over it. However, although not all the RS products have 3D models, there is a huge library availble that is being added to all the time.
I would say that this software allows anyone with a computer to learn and pick up some 3D design skills, whether it be it for buisiness, individuals, students or hobbyists.
Comments
Add a commentJanuary 20, 2020 09:18
The learning curve is steep. This package is NOT intuitive by any means. The first thing I noticed when going to the community for answers is that this package is buggy, and questions go completely unanswered.
I'm just trying to model a test fixture that I'm designing. I've done a lot of 2-D using Visio. There is no smooth transition between 2-D and 3-D. This is my first attempt and I'm completely frustrated because much of the help files cryptic at best.
January 2, 2019 08:29
not for me ! is all i can say.
January 2, 2019 15:02
@Dansindan sorry you have had issues installing DesignSpark Mechanical. We've passed your comments to our software team to see if they can help.
[Comment was deleted]
[Comment was deleted]
[Comment was deleted]
January 2, 2019 08:29
took 2hrs to register the software just to be able to launch it. it better be worth the hassle!
could be worth the aganoy but havent even seen the startup screen yet!
January 2, 2019 08:29
had massive problems just registering. not pleased! whats going on it a registration problem costing you millions if this product is any good. havent even been able to install it on my machine with out this mega problem.
July 27, 2017 07:33
I tried design Spark a couple of times and I found it too cumbersome and tying so much so I have removed it and reverted back to Labcenter Proteus.
With Design Spark there are 'rituals' I find tiring and burdensome so much so I have reverted back to Labcenter Proteus, here I can go straight to PCB layout select board size and components without hassle.
Sorry to be negative but this is my honest view, Design Spark is not for me.
July 27, 2017 18:04
@Pentode I had a licenced copy of Proteus a while ago which although good was very disjointed regarding the SCH and PCB design. It has probably improved over time, but adopting DSPCB V3 was the best move I have ever made. Simple things like positioning precisely had to be done by zooming to max and accepting the cursor coordinates (LabCentre said this was "good enough") whereas DSPCB let me use precise values. Staying with DSPCB and learning it in detail has paid dividends and the product continues to be developed for free. I have no intention of moving back.
July 27, 2017 18:05
@Pentode This article is about DesignSpark Mechanical... Isn't Labcenter Proteus a paid for piece of software so surely a comparison to a free piece of software isn't truly representative.