Lernen Sie DesignSpark PCB

Hi Somehow I have undocked the menu bar (ribbon) from designSpark PCB 11.0.2. I cannot retrieve it through the help menu or settings/customise etc. It appears briefly as a small undocked window off the edge of my screen when I first start the application (see below) but disappears once the application has started. I have tried re-installing the application and restarting my PC. It is unusable without the menu bar how do I get it back?

Designing an 8-layer PCB requires specific decisions to ensure high performance, durability and adherence to client specifications. These components have four signal layers and four plane layers. People often choose them because their applications need high-density circuits for high-performance results. These PCBs also provide expanded capacities compared to their counterparts. What should electronics designers do when creating these products for innovative products and needs? https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/how-do-8-layer-pcbs-revolutionize-circuit-design  

Bonjour, S'il vous plaît, comment puis-je trouver l'impédance d'une large piste dans DesignSpark PCB ? Merci d'avance

Good morning,i have several problems with packages editing.In the previous version of designspark pcb i was able to create a components with different packages.I was able to switch easly from packages and edit them, it was enough to select the package, double click and edit it.  So i have a long list of components in my library  with multiple packages and pcb symbol. With this new version, i can't switch, edit or delete the packages in my components. I have to rebuild the whole library. How i can delete/edit from an existing component the package? Thank you    

Hi! How many computers can I connect to my Design Spark PCB Engineer subscription? Thank you.

So as title says, I can't see any previews of the symbols or the pcbs when trying to add a component via the menu. I can see them when in components or in the Add component dockable window but not when it pops out.  It only shows a grey square.  I tried zooming in and out. Am I missing something?

In the past, my design technology file was configured such that line widths for things like standard text, line widths for resistor PCB symbol outlines etc were set to '5' (whatever that means). Using DS11 I find that when zoomed to view the whole PCB at once, I end up with spidery thin lines and text that is hard to read. If I change the line and text width in the technology file by just a small fraction (from '5' to '6'), then it makes a big difference to the line width as viewed on screen (the line width on screen appears wider by a factor of about 2). I assume there has been a change in the way the 'zoom resolution' is mapped onto the actual screen resolution. I don't remember this happending with earlier versions of DS. The screen grabs below illustrate the point:- Line width = '5' Line width = '6'

Using DS11, I opened a project originally created in DS9. If I try and edit one of the components, I get an error message:- If I try to add a new instance of the same component, then it does find it in the library.   I get the same issue irrespective of whether I am working on the schematic or the PCB. What is going on?  

This is why you SAVE your work OFTEN. When editing a schematic symbol, I selected the entire symbol to see if I could rotate it, AND IT CLOSED DS !! YIKES !!

Hello, I have my schematic and PCB finished, but when I generate the GERBER files there is no board outline. I tried following the guide here: https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/how-can-i-add-a-board-outline-to-my-gerber-plots but when I create a new layer, renamed as Board Outline, it doesn't show up on the list in the centre of the pop-up window, under the 4 tabs (see attached screenshot). Any ideas how to generate the board outline in the Gerber files? Thanks.

⚡ We are pleased to announce that the NEW OKdo Hub is now live on DesignSpark!In collaboration with OKdo, we have developed a comprehensive resource hub tailored to meet the needs of professional engineers and developers. https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/okdo-embedded-solutions Here's what you can find: A variety of operating systems available including Android, Debian, and Ubuntu.Detailed resources and guides to assist with the deployment and development of your projects.

We have  multiple versions of some PBCBs (V1.0, V1.1, etc.) Is there a way to see the diffrences?  The changes were probably very minor.  If I could open both PCBs and then quickly jump from one to the other, maybe the diftence would 'flash" Another option is to open the files in a Text editor and  compare them, but I don't know the format.

Hi Forum, In working with individual pads, I noticed in the layer list there is no soldermask (resist?) for the top SMT layer. Is the soldermask layer on the TOP, where the SMT parts are, generated automatically in a later PCB step? I also noticed that in the downloaded parts there is also no top soldermask layer. There IS a soldermask layer, but it is on the bottom of the board. Not of much use if the SMT parts are on the top? Is this bottom layer soldermask there to change layer to the top if I want it? Why would any PCB be made without soldermask on the top of the board where the SMT parts are?

Hi again forum, I need to create test point pads which will have various plated thru hole sizes. Also, several custom round pads for some thru hole components. I noticed that when using the PAD function in schematic, I get a single center point. When using the PAD function in PCB, I pretty much get the same thing, on just one layer. How do I auto-produce pads that have all layers already intact, and are editable? Does a selection of pads already exist somewhere in DS?

Hi Forum, First of two posts. Firstly, the new edition of Design Spark PCB is SO much better than the last. These guys have been working hard. There is, however, one issue that has not been addressed. When edited schematic symbols are placed on the schematic drawing, the first 90 degree rotation works perfectly.  Any subsequent rotation dismembers the poor schematic symbol. An issue that needs to be addressed.