DesignSpark Mechanicalを学ぶ

Pozdrav  Na koji nacin mogu obnoviti pretplatu te izvrsiti uplat

After creating the sketch, DSM automatically cuts out the surface for me. How to turn it off. It used to be enough to turn off the Enable Constraint based sketching option. now it doesn't work.

Hello, I am a complete newbie to the program. Nevertheless, I created a CAD drawing of my project as part of my final thesis. Now I would like to insert this into my PowerPoint as a rotating object. Does the program offer me this option? I would then record it with OBS and then embed the video in the PowerPoint.TLDR:I need an automatic rotation of the CAD drawing

When can the program be adapted for macOS? This is the best design program for Windows. But I switched to macOS.

Hi, I can't find out how I can start to draw a line (or anyting) a spesific distance from another line (or object). I'm drawing a house, and when I want to draw a window in the wall, I want to start 1000 mm from left and 500 mm from top of the wall. How can I start at this point.  So far I'm drawing lines (1000 from left and 500 from top) and then erase them after the window is finished. I hope there is another way to do this?

The AutoCad options do not appear in my File Options panel, how can I enable them?  

HiI specifically bought a subscription to import OBJ files. But this feature never showed up. What is the problem?

図面モードで破断にした時 破断面の線を直線からジグザグ線に変更しようと  ファイル→Design Sparkオプション→図面→一般→ラインスタイルのオプション→破断ビューのクリッピングエッジを変更しても変化有りません。知っている方が居られたら宜しくお願い致します。

I would like to create two objects from one,possibly with "clip with plane". I want an upper half and a lower half. can someone help?

winodws10では正常に動作していましたが、windows11にアップグレートしてからは、DesignSpark Mechanicalを起動するとエラー表示してスタートしません。FAQを見ても１，２，３，５を確認しても解決しません。 ネット接続も問題なく、DSMだけ異常で、プロフィールを見ても問題なく、登録をやり直して承認されたメールアドレスを入力しても解決しません。  

Just an example of the Fill patch with tangent command. Not of G2 surface continuity 'A' class quality, but under the hood or of everything other than high mirror gloss finish, perfectly adaquate but that's your decision and not mine to make. If attempting this, be aware it takes a some practice to get proficient at surface modelling.     A less extreme patch with wider apart Y branches... Note the reflections.

When i try to start the DesignSpark a popup window says: "DesignSparkencountered an error during registration" , but i Swedish. What shuld i do?

In version 2 of Plasticity ( powerful Parasolid modeller) , X-nurbs is introduced for the premium Studio licence. X-nurbs is a fast professional tool having professional Lofting and Patching functionality with G1 and G2 surface continuity controls. This YT contributor had problems with Plasticity current Indie licence to make the blend. Plasticity xNURBS for PRODUCT DESIGN Can Be Amazing! (youtube.com) Here below is DSM v6 making the blend with accurate G1 Surface continuity. Surface curvature continuity ( G2) can be approached and approximated by moving the spline control points manually see below image - Explorer can do this! For many shapes , DSM has sufficiant tools to do the job. Learn with DSM ! Below an automatic Patch fill with tangency - pink faces are a separate face.     Below is the rear face Patch filled with automatic tangency.   TIP: It only works because the pink surface is a separate surface - when patched, then combine the face to join. Tangency is very accurate to all edges.   For users of Creator and Engineer, simply use the Mirror Tool to make a mirror surface joining automatically. An option is to maintain mirror face relatationships or not.

Under Display>Split Windows one can create a second Viewport - of the same part.  What I want is two different parts (/files) - from the tab-row below - to display side-by-side. How can that be achieved?

The idea came from an online recent video from a popular channel promoting Plasticity The shape evolved as the 3D form suggested pleasing shapes and finally the fillet sizes ( edge pulled rounds) could be experimented with just by changine their sizes. For the fillets, I went with what was possible for the given filleting conditions between it's adjacent faces ( 3 very different shape forms all meeting at a single point ) and decided not manually create a rolling fillet even if it could be possible. I actually didn't think it necessry nor attractive with this final 3D form. Does anyone like this?   Always do the small fillets last...   I might attempt later an alternative manual fillet ~ might There are some very useful tips concerning the breaking of edges to allow such manual filleting on that video. In DSM we can break edges directly without splitting the surface using the isoparam UV paths. Nope. Ordinary fillets definitely good enough around these 3 intersecting faces with a single common tangency vertex - which is a bad visual design. Looks best with a small blend.