Skip to main content
shopping_basket Basket 0

Are we losing interest in the Internet of Things?

Bill Marshall

What prompted the question above was a TV commercial for the ‘latest’ must-have gadget for the Connected Home: a camera that allows you to see what’s happening in your living room remotely via a smartphone. Did I just see that, or perhaps my brain just slipped back in time 10 years on a nostalgia trip?

I have thought for some time that the domestic IoT lacked a ‘killer app’. Those applications that have emerged are mainly extensions of ideas that have been around for literally decades: wearable fitness monitors and home automation. And the marketing, particularly for home automation (or the Connected Home) is getting more and more desperate as the hype fails to match the actual product reality. As the Gartner Technology Hype Cycle predicts, public disillusionment may be just around the corner. Here are a couple of examples of recent connected home products that either failed to fly off the shelves or flew off and then flew straight back. They feature in this article about the 2017 Gartner Hype Cycle.

The Lifestyle Product for people with More Money than Sense


The Juicero juice maker hit the headlines recently but for all the wrong reasons. This Wi-Fi connected device squeezed pouches of fruit/vegetable mixtures into a glass so creating a healthy drink without the bother of chopping up the ingredients yourself or cleaning the machine afterwards. For this convenience you paid (initially, until potential customers decided they didn’t need such a costly boost to their lifestyle) $700 plus $5 to $8 per pouch. Just in case you tried to use cheaper pouches from another supplier, this clever machine rejected anything without the correct QR code. Then came the real stunner: some spoil-sport discovered that you could extract the juice without the machine at all by, er, squeezing the pouch with your hands. Cue outraged customers returning machines for a refund, red-faced technology pundits back-tracking frantically, backers pulling their money out and the rest of humanity shaking their heads in disbelief.

The Expensive Replacement for Old Technology


Otto was another IoT start-up that fell foul of the old axiom: if it ain’t broke then don’t replace it with a more expensive technologically-advanced, but less-functional solution. The Otto door lock was a Bluetooth/Wi-Fi enabled keyless replacement for the humble mechanical deadbolt. A very nice piece of design but again, the price was way too high ($700) for something that potentially reduced security. One selling point was that you could provide genuine party guests with access to your home, but gatecrashers would not be admitted. Hmmm, sounds like desperate marketing again which failed to impress anybody.

The SmartWatch still clings on

 When smart watches first appeared, I thought: ‘Why would I want to pay £300 for a plastic digital watch?’ ‘Ah’, they said, ‘but this watch can monitor your body’s vital signs and nag you about not getting enough exercise too’. ‘Thanks’, I said, but I’m not obsessed with the former and my wife handles the latter very well’. Anyway, I don’t want all my health data beamed into the Cloud where it can be analysed by some intelligence, artificial or otherwise. ‘Fitness bands’ have been around for ages, but you had to download the data into your own (off-line) computer for analysis – no opportunities for hacking. The IoT just seems to benefit the malevolent snooper in this case. My interest in smartwatches was aroused recently, albeit briefly, with the announcement of the Apple Watch 3. At last, you could use it to communicate – the Dick Tracy watch is here! (N.B. Younger readers should check the Internet for references to this 1950’s fictional detective and his legendary watch.) Then I realised that only one service provider (not mine) could support it in the UK. Typical. Oh well, a watch that needs its battery recharging nearly every night could be very annoying.

A Practical Use for the Fitness Band

While the wireless-connected health monitor, to me at any rate, has limited serious value to most ‘well’ people, a week spent in the hospital recently, suggested that in-patients could really benefit from its use. Obviously, lives could be saved by the device instantly signalling problems to a central nurses’ station, usually outside the ward. However, unless you’ve spent some time in a hospital bed you may not realise that a nurse might be taking blood pressure and temperature readings every few hours – including all through the night. An open ward is frequently a noisy place at night, with lights constantly being switched on and off as well. Sleep is at a premium and an IoT device which cut down on the routine disturbance would be welcomed by patients and over-worked staff alike. In case you’re wondering about bans on mobile phones scuppering the idea: where I was, all patients had phones and they were in constant use! Just a thought. One for the MIoT (Medical IoT).

"If I had asked people what they wanted, they'd have said faster horses"

This quote is attributed to car maker Henry Ford and taken to mean that the entrepreneur should tell the people what they want - a Product Push approach that often leads to failure. In fact, Ford did give people what they wanted: not more horses, but more horsepower.

If you're stuck for something to do, follow my posts on Twitter. I link to interesting articles on new electronics and related technologies, retweeting posts I spot about robots, space exploration and other issues.

Engineer, PhD, lecturer, freelance technical writer, blogger & tweeter interested in robots, AI, planetary explorers and all things electronic. STEM ambassador. Designed, built and programmed my first microcomputer in 1976. Still learning, still building, still coding today.

Recommended Articles


[Comment was deleted]

February 5, 2018 15:23

I lost interest in the IoT in 1995 - see my patent and notes here:
Note the 3D printed prototype enclosure - lost interest in that back then too...

Over 192 references/citations to that patent... less than 0.01% of patents receive more than 100 citations....

Hedy Lamarr and her piano player only have 112 for coming up with Spread Spectrum: see -

I really don't need my toaster on the internet...

See my marketturd rant on why you should do things:

Note my quote from Ian in Jurassic Park about half way down the page... here's another:
"Just because you could, doesn't mean you should ..."

Another great quote from the novel:
“In the information society, nobody thinks. We expected to banish paper, but we actually banished thought.”
~~ Michael Crichton, Jurassic Park

BTW - I used to buy my DSL (Covad) way back from Steve Crocker - He wrote RFC 1 - Host Software.

He told me Arpanet was never meant to be public and secure...

Talk about an overstimulated species - recall, less than 150 years ago, most still only had candlelight, with many people living 8-15 per small two room house, and we were traveling at no more than about 30 MPH,

Our flicker fusion threshold of about 25 FPS means we should not be moving much faster ... but yet we try.

Then we wonder why it's getting so silly.

“You never change things by fighting the existing reality.
To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
~~R. Buckminster Fuller


0 Votes

February 5, 2018 10:49

I love Whizzy-Whiz new technology. My house is alive with gadgets and techno-toys. It’s fun.
Why on earth would anyone want to give any of it Internet access when security is the lowest priority given by manufacturers?
We have two networks in our home - a private (non-WiFi, non-internet connected one [air-gapped] that has our private servers and
integrated toys on it), and one that has our Netflix and computers used for email, games, etc.
Some consumers get so wrapped up in the Dream of all the shiny-shiny without thinking of all the Nightmares that unfettered access to your life and data (and House!!) can bring.
People need to THINK about what they are inviting into their home when they install this junk.
Internet of Thieves...

January 29, 2018 09:24

I'm still looking for the killer app that I need. "Need" is the essential word.
Anything (in my view) that simply connects by the internet instead of wires or say Bluetooth is not part of the IoT, but that might just be my age... it's just wireless.
Having said that, things I would like are a key fob operated front door, but with security (another key word "security"), but I don't need remote monitoring so just secure wireless.
I would also like a remote water meter reader of the old "in a hole mechanical meters" this should have extras such as unusual consumption pattern detection to provide an alarm (over the internet) for remote information, could be usefull!
Things I don't require are knowing when I'm running out of something in the fridge!

Industry, hospitals, sports facilities could all be good application areas if they remove some burden on stretched staffing as you state providing monitoring of at risk patents. Process control in industry is a strong contender for out of the norm monitoring, but what do I really need at home that isn't provided by some non-internet solution?
A total environmental control was one thought, checking air quality, humidity, temperature etc., But would I be forever overriding it, opening the window when I'm feeling hot when the system thinks it's perfect.
Love to hear other views and what will be the 'killer apps'.

0 Votes

February 3, 2018 23:17

@Boss In my opinion there is insufficient demand for domestic IoT to justify all the frantic activity. Amazon say they are making a good profit with their Echo system, but personally I don't feel the need for voice operation of everything. Perhaps they're cleverly tapping into a kind of 'imagined nostalgia' for the days when one's household servants responded to verbal commands! As for the IIoT and Industry 4.0, that may be a different story....

[Comment was deleted]

DesignSpark Electrical Logolinkedin